<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Could I Forget?</title>
	<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/718</link>
	<description>A tiny principality in the Commonwealth of Letters</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Deb</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/718#comment-610</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 23:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/718#comment-610</guid>
					<description>I second the Wrinkle in Time recommendation, strongly. L'Engle also wrote a poignant memoir of living thru her husband's death from cancer. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the Wrinkle in Time recommendation, strongly. L&#8217;Engle also wrote a poignant memoir of living thru her husband&#8217;s death from cancer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Will Duquette</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/718#comment-609</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 18:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/718#comment-609</guid>
					<description>I don't where L'Engle stands theologically; I do know she's an Episcopalian; but I repeat myself.  Her books frequently involve Christian characters and backgrounds, but they aren't heavily theological.

You should at least read &lt;i&gt;A Wrinkle in Time&lt;/i&gt;, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t where L&#8217;Engle stands theologically; I do know she&#8217;s an Episcopalian; but I repeat myself.  Her books frequently involve Christian characters and backgrounds, but they aren&#8217;t heavily theological.</p>
<p>You should at least read <i>A Wrinkle in Time</i>, though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lars Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/718#comment-608</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 18:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/718#comment-608</guid>
					<description>I don't want to trash another (and far more succesful) author, but I've always had a problem with Madeleine L'Engle. When I say that I have to admit I haven't actually read any of her novels. But I've read articles by her, and interviews with her. In those pieces she has stated clearly that a central point in her world-view is a strong distinction between Truth and Fact. As something of a follower of Francis Schaeffer, I consider this very dangerous thinking indeed, and likely to lead to a denial of the Incarnation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to trash another (and far more succesful) author, but I&#8217;ve always had a problem with Madeleine L&#8217;Engle. When I say that I have to admit I haven&#8217;t actually read any of her novels. But I&#8217;ve read articles by her, and interviews with her. In those pieces she has stated clearly that a central point in her world-view is a strong distinction between Truth and Fact. As something of a follower of Francis Schaeffer, I consider this very dangerous thinking indeed, and likely to lead to a denial of the Incarnation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
