<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Atrocity Archive, by Charles Stross</title>
	<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331</link>
	<description>This and that, now and then.  Mostly book reviews, with the occasional descent into whimsy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Will Duquette</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1893</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1893</guid>
					<description>Stross doesn't specify, but that's a good guess.  But it's even more likely, I'd say, that it involves whether a person who starts reading a old book of dubious provenance and blasphemous contents found it in a deserted house will ever be able to finish reading it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stross doesn&#8217;t specify, but that&#8217;s a good guess.  But it&#8217;s even more likely, I&#8217;d say, that it involves whether a person who starts reading a old book of dubious provenance and blasphemous contents found it in a deserted house will ever be able to finish reading it or not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: karrde</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1887</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1887</guid>
					<description>So, does the Turing-Lovecraft theorem involve whether a poet will always be able to stop writing a particular poem he's working on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, does the Turing-Lovecraft theorem involve whether a poet will always be able to stop writing a particular poem he&#8217;s working on?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TJIC</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1832</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1832</guid>
					<description>Not really.

Singularity Sky and Iron Sunrise are both pretty good SF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really.</p>
<p>Singularity Sky and Iron Sunrise are both pretty good SF.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Will Duquette</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1821</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1821</guid>
					<description>Any other stinkers to avoid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any other stinkers to avoid?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TJIC</title>
		<link>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1820</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.foothills.wjduquette.com/blog/archives/1331#comment-1820</guid>
					<description>Atrocity Archives is one excellent book, and Stross is a good writer.  ...but some of his stuff is crap.  Accelerando, for example, should be avoided.

His Merchant Princes homage to Zelazny's Amber is quite good, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atrocity Archives is one excellent book, and Stross is a good writer.  &#8230;but some of his stuff is crap.  Accelerando, for example, should be avoided.</p>
<p>His Merchant Princes homage to Zelazny&#8217;s Amber is quite good, too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
